PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2024Astronomy and Astrophysics3 citationsOpen Access

Magnetic braking below the cataclysmic variable period gap and the observed dearth of period bouncers

View Full Paper
ASArnab SarkarARAntonio C. RodriguezSGSivan Ginzburg

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Context. Period bouncers are cataclysmic variables (CVs) that have evolved past their orbital period minimum. The strong disagreement between theory and observations of the relative fraction of period bouncers is a severe shortcoming in the understanding of CV evolution. Aims. We test the implications of the hypothesis that magnetic braking (MB), which is suggested to be an additional angular momentum loss (AML) mechanism for CVs below the period gap ( P orb ≲ 120 min), weakens around their period minimum. Methods. We computed the evolution of CV donors below the period gap using the MESA code, assuming that the evolution of the system is driven by AML due to gravitational wave radiation (GWR) and MB. We parametrised the MB strength as AML MB = κ AML GWR . We computed two qualitatively different sets of models, one in which κ is a constant and another in which κ depends on stellar parameters in such a way that the value of κ decreases as the CV approaches the period minimum ( P orb ≈ 80 min), beyond which κ ≈ 0. Results. We find that two crucial effects drive the latter set of models. (1) A decrease in κ as CVs approach the period minimum stalls their evolution so that they spend a long time in the observed period minimum spike (80 ≲ P orb /min ≲ 86). Here, they become difficult to distinguish from pre-bounce systems in the spike. (2) A strong decrease in the mass-transfer rate makes them virtually undetectable as they evolve further. So, the CV stalls around the period minimum and then “disappears”. This reduces the number of detectable bouncers. Physical processes, such as dynamo action, white dwarf magnetism, and dead zones, may cause such a weakening of MB at short orbital periods. Conclusions. The weakening MB formalism provides a possible solution to the problem of the dearth of detectable period bouncers in CV observational surveys.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sarkar et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66b2fb6db6435875f6c39https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449345
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A new technique for calculations of binary stellar evolution, with application to magnetic braking1983 · 741 citations
  2. 2Rotation and Activity in Mid‐M to L Field Dwarfs2003 · 465 citations
  3. 3On magnetic braking of late-type stars1987 · 253 citations
  4. 4Gravitational radiation and the evolution of cataclysmic binaries1981 · 195 citations
  5. 5Magnetic field breakout from white dwarf crystallization dynamos2024 · 23 citations