PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2024Journal of Clinical Oncology1 citations

Identifying digital pathology imaging based biomarkers of checkpoint inhibitor response in non-small cell lung cancer.

View Full Paper
SPSushant PatkarACAlex ChenRRRahul Rajendran

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

8530 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting Programmed Death 1 (PD1) or Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PDL1) have revolutionized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, yet only 30% of patients respond effectively. Although approved for patient selection, using PDL1 expression as a biomarker of treatment response is controversial in predicting clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for more robust alternatives. Methods: We explore the potential of AI-based approaches using H 26 Partial/Complete response, 78 stable/Progressive disease) and the publicly available TCGA-NSCLC cohort (N=986) were-utilized for multi-task training. The remaining 40% of the SUNY cohort (N=62; 16 Partial/Complete response, 46 stable/Progressive disease) was used for testing. Training was done in 5-fold cross-validation. The final model was chosen as an ensemble of models trained over all 5 folds. Train and test splits were generated using a stratified random sampling approach, ensuring that the proportion of responders versus non-responders remained unchanged across splits. Performance was evaluated utilizing percentage accuracy (all true positive values), precision (positive predictive value), recall (sensitivity) and F1 scores (mean value of precision and recall). Attention maps generated by the AI model were used to highlight relevant spatial regions of the TME significantly associated with ICI responses. Results: Our multi-task attention-based approach achieves an overall predictive accuracy of 79%, precision of 0.53, recall of 0.24, and an F1 score of 0.33 on the held-out test set. In contrast, pathologist derived PDL1 IHC scores ≥50% exhibit an accuracy of 47%, precision of 0.09, recall of 0.125, and an F1 score of 0.11. Conclusions: Initial findings indicate that attention-based multitask learning of NSCLC H&E- images could uncover crucial tumor intrinsic and microenvironmental features that are predictive of ICI responses in patients. Inclusion of additional clinical and molecular data for training and validation holds potential to further improve ICI response prediction accuracy using AI-derived biomarkers and classifiers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patkar et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66dd2b6db6435875f90e5https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.8530
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract 4170: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based multi-modal approach using H&E and CT image for predicting treatment response of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Abstract 7380: Predicting immunotherapy outcomes from H&E images in lung cancer2024
  3. 3Use of artificial intelligence–based digital pathology to predict outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced gastro-esophageal cancer.2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Deep learning–based chest CT model to predict treatment response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer independently and additively to histopathological biomarkers.2024
  5. 561Predicting immunotherapy response in ccRCC using deep learning on histopathological slides2025