PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2024Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Analyzing influential factors in suboptimal cervical cancer screening rates at Kline Health Center and implementing a subsequent initiative for improvement.

View Full Paper
WNWern Lynn NgAHAlice HeGBGabriela Calderon Barahona

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

e23252 Background: The UPMC-Kline Health Center (KHC) in Harrisburg, PA, shows a lower cervical cancer screening rate compared to the general population in the USA (57.08% vs 78%, respectively, based on the Medical Group Fiscal Year 2023 Internal Quality Measures). To understand this gap, we distributed a comprehensive questionnaire to patients, aiming to pinpoint factors contributing to the lower screening rate and plan targeted interventions for improvement. Methods: We randomly distributed questionnaires to female patients aged 21 to 61 during appointment check-in at the KHC, considering our linguistically diverse patient population with surveys available in Spanish, English, and Nepali. Given the diverse linguistic landscape of our patient population, we prepared questionnaires in Spanish, English, and Nepali. The survey aims to identify and address specific clinic-related problems, with a follow-up assessment after a few months to gauge improvements following interventions targeting the underlying causes of screening gaps. Results: Over a three-month span, 65 questionnaires were completed. Among the participants, 38% (25 patients - 7 white/Caucasian, 11 black/African American, 1 Asian, 7 others; 12 Hispanic, 13 non-Hispanic) revealed that they had not undergone screening within the past three years. The analysis of this subgroup unveiled significant issues: 84% (21/25) did not receive paperwork to schedule the test, 88% (22/25) were not contacted to schedule the test, 76% (19/25) did not receive reminder notifications before appointments, and 72%(18/25) expressed concerns about the lack of insurance coverage for costs. Furthermore, 76% (19/25) indicated the requirement to pay a co-pay, and an equal percentage reported difficulties in obtaining the screening test. Additionally, 72%(18/25) mentioned that their healthcare providers did not discuss the screening's importance, while 76%(19/25) noted their providers did not explain the purpose of the test. Conclusions: These findings underscore critical gaps in communication, accessibility, and cost-related barriers to cervical cancer screening at KHC. This ongoing quality improvement project, scheduled for data recollection in a few months, encompasses proposed interventions such as automated reminders, technology integration for communication, and distributing flyers in clinic and waiting areas to foster open communication and address inadequate discussions about the importance of screening. The aim is to improve patient awareness, engagement, and ultimately prevent delayed cancer diagnoses. KHC is committed to enhancing the cervical cancer screening rate to minimize the likelihood of delayed cancer diagnoses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ng et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66f03b6db6435875fa1afhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e23252
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An analysis of factors contributing to low colonoscopy rates at Kline Health Center in comparison to the national average in the USA (according to the internal quality measures of the medical group fiscal year 2023) and a follow-up initiative to improve colon cancer screening participation.2024
  2. 2Understanding Cervical Screening Rates at TUKHS Division of General Internal Medicine2024
  3. 3Building capacity for equitable cervical cancer screening and follow-up in an FQHC–NCI cancer center partnership: a mixed-methods study of multilevel implementation determinants2026
  4. 4Abstract C132: Building capacity for equitable cervical cancer care in safety-net settings through an FQHC-NCI comprehensive cancer center partnership in Los Angeles2024
  5. 5Abstract 3451: Association of multi-level factors with cervical cancer screening in healthcare settings2024