PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2024Journal of Clinical Oncology1 citations

Individualized tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA analysis for molecular residual disease detection in predicting recurrence and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

View Full Paper
DCDi CaoQZQiaoxia ZhouXFXuning Fan

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

3615 Background: Molecular residual disease (MRD) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may identify recurrent risk and guide adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study explored the feasibility of a tumor-informed personalized approach to predict recurrence, comparing with tumor-informed (TI) and tumor naïve (TN) fixed panel approaches. Methods: Patients with stage I-IV CRC eligible for R0 resection were recruited. Blood samples were collected preoperatively, at postoperative day 7 and 30 (POD7/30), and every 3-6 months thereafter, which were tested by brPROPHET assay, using up to 50 highly ranked variants identified by whole-exome sequencing of surgical tissue samples. A fixed 168-gene panel was applied for TI and TN fixed panel tests. Results: A total of 214 patients were enrolled. With a median follow-up of 13.2 months, 20 (9.3%) participants relapsed. The brPROPHET assay had a positivity rate of 96% in preoperative samples. ctDNA positivity indicated by brPROPHET predicted worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) at both POD7 (hazard ratio HR=7.35, 95% confidence interval 95% CI, 3.04-17.78, P0.0316/mL was observed in surveillance of 15 relapsed patients, which was associated with worse RFS (HR=44.47, 95% CI, 12.83-154.12, P<0.001). In ctDNA positive patients at POD7, patients benefit from ACT (HR=0.23, 95% CI, 0.05-1.00, P=0.03), which was not observed in ctDNA negative patients (HR=1.80, 95% CI, 0.48-6.81, P=0.38). Among the patients with results of all three approaches (n=168), the brPROPHET assay outperformed TI and TN fixed-panel assays in predicting RFS at POD7 (HR, 7.52 vs 3.43 and 5.60). Of note, the brPROPHET assay identified 6 additional relapsed patients beyond the fixed panels, with more than 87.5% of the positive sites derived from personalized designs. Conclusions: The individualized tumor-informed brPROPHET assay effectively identified postoperative patients with high risk of recurrence and benefit from ACT. Using a personalized tumor-informed panel that covers sites outside fixed panels may improve the utility of MRD detection. Table: see text

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cao et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e671cdb6db6435875fc9b5https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.3615
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to stratify recurrence risk and adjuvant treatment benefit in a real-world colorectal cancer (CRC) cohort.2026
  2. 2Tumor-informed versus tumor-agnostic ctDNA assays for molecular residual disease detection in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2026
  3. 3CORRECT-MRD I: A clinical validation study to predict recurrence in stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC) using a bespoke circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay to detect molecular residual disease (MRD).2024
  4. 4ctDNA-based molecular residual disease and survival in resectable colorectal cancer2024 · 236 citations
  5. 5Abstract 3840: Detection of minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer patients after surgery through circulating tumor DNA profiling2026