PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2024Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Association of baseline inflammatory biomarkers and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

View Full Paper
AYAhmet YıldırımMWMengting WeiYLYuan Liu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

4548 Background: Multiple inflammatory biomarkers such as modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil to eosinophil ratio (NER) have been identified in RCC. We analyzed those biomarkers in patients with aRCC treated with ICIs to assess the association with treatment outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients with aRCC treated with ICIs at Emory Winship Cancer Institute between 2018 and 2023. Clinical benefit (CB) is determined by stable disease, partial response, and complete response. mGPS (combining albumin and CRP), NLR, MLR, PLR, and NER data were collected from the baseline bloodwork. Multivariate and univariate analyses were conducted on PFS, OS, and CB. MVA was built by controlling the age, gender, race, BMI, smoking status, IMDC risk group, clear cell histology, prior treatment, liver metastases, ECOG performance score, and number of distant metastases, which were subject to backward elimination at the significant level of p < 0.2 Results: Our analysis included a total of 401 patients (118:283 F:M, median age: 66). On univariate analysis, high mGPS, NLR, MLR, PLR, and NER were related to inferior CB; hazard ratios (HR) (95% CI, p value) were 3.03 (1.35-6.77, p=0.005), 1.86 (1.14-3.03, p=0.013), 1.83 (1.10-3.02, p=0.019), 2.37 (1.52-3.71, p <.001), 1.93 (1.22-3.05, p=0.005) respectively. On multivariate analysis, NLR, PLR, NER had statistically significant correlation with CB, HR (95% CI) were 1.75 (1.01-3.04, p=0.047), 2.21 (1.33-3.66, p=0.002), 2.07 (1.24-3.47, p=0.006). Conclusions: The results demonstrated that high systemic inflammatory biomarkers may be related to worse clinical outcomes with ICI treatment. Prospective studies are needed for further validation. Table: see text

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yıldırım et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e673e9b6db6435875fdf0fhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.4548
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Association of immune-related adverse events, inflammatory biomarkers, and clinical outcomes in patients treated with ICIs for advanced renal cell carcinoma.2024
  2. 2Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers as Continuous Variables in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Linearity Assessment, Proportional Hazards Assumption Testing, and Time‐Varying Effects2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3The Prognostic Role of Baseline and Early Dynamics of Peripheral Blood Cell Ratios in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Nivolumab2026 · 3 citations
  4. 4Inflammation-based prognostic markers in renal cell carcinoma: insights from a 15-year experience2025 · 5 citations
  5. 5The Association and Predictive Value of Nutritional and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors2026