Corneal Backscatter, Pachymetric Indices, and Ectasia Indices for the Assessment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Purpose: To determine whether corneal backscatter, pachymetric indices, and ectasia indices derived from Scheimpflug tomography can identify Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) corneas with abnormal tomography, the relationships between these parameters and tomographic edema in FECD, and if these parameters help predict improvement in central corneal thickness (CCT) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: Tomography maps of 132 eyes of 80 subjects with FECD were analyzed to determine how backscatter, pachymetric, and ectasia parameters compared with the instrument's normative database and if any predicted tomographic edema. Tomography maps from a separate group undergoing DMEK were split into derivation (48 eyes of 39 subjects) and validation (45 eyes of 41 subjects) subgroups to derive a predictive model of improvement in CCT after DMEK. Backscatter, pachymetric, and ectasia parameters were incorporated to determine if the model could be enhanced. Results: Among all ectasia, pachymetric, and backscatter parameters, at best only 65% of FECD corneas with definite tomographic edema could be identified based on the instrument's normative database. Among all parameters individually, the highest sensitivity for detecting tomographic edema was 77%. Anterior and mid-corneal backscatter featured in a model predicting improvement in CCT after DMEK with high performance in derivation (R 2 = 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.87) and validation (R 2 = 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.52–0.83) subgroups. Conclusions: The Scheimpflug camera software program could not reliably detect abnormal tomography in FECD from corneal backscatter, pachymetric indices, or ectasia indices. Corneal backscatter contributes to, but does not enhance, a predictive model of improvement in CCT after DMEK.