PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2024Kybernetes1 citations

Unveiling current and future trends in customer banking experience research: a bibliometric analysis

View Full Paper
MYMengxi YangWWWalton WiderSXShuoran Xiao

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Purpose This research is the first to use bibliometric analysis to provide insight into the landscape and forecast the future of customer experience research in the banking sector. Design/methodology/approach We used bibliographic coupling and co-word analysis to delineate the existing knowledge structure after reviewing 338 articles from the Web of Science database. Findings The bibliographic coupling analysis revealed five key clusters: customer engagement and experience in digital banking; customer experience and service management; customer experience and market resilience; digital transformation and customer experience; and digital technology and customer experience—each representing a significant strand of current research. In addition, the co-word analysis revealed four emerging themes: customer experience through AI and blockchain, digital evolution in banking, experience-driven ecosystems for customer satisfaction, and trust-based holistic banking experience. Practical implications These findings not only sketch an overview of the current research domain but also hint at emerging areas ideal for scholarly investigation. While highlighting the industry’s rapid adaptation to technological advances, this study calls for more integrative research to unravel the complexities of customer experience in the evolving digital banking ecosystem. Originality/value This review presents a novel state-of-the-art analysis of customer banking experience research by employing a science mapping via bibliometric analysis to unveil the knowledge and temporal structure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6859fb6db64358760e8aehttps://doi.org/10.1108/k-11-2023-2251
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations2020 · 990 citations
  2. 2Understanding the Downstream Healthcare Supply Chain: Unpacking Regulatory and Industry Characteristics2019 · 80 citations
  3. 3Word-of-Mouth Engagement in Online Social Networks: Influence of Network Centrality and Density2023 · 63 citations
  4. 4The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun1982 · 8,100 citations
  5. 5Mapping themes, trends, and knowledge structure of Behcet syndrome: a bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 20212023 · 8 citations