PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 23, 2024Operations Research7 citationsOpen Access

Adaptive, Doubly Optimal No-Regret Learning in Strongly Monotone and Exp-Concave Games with Gradient Feedback

View Full Paper
MJMichael I. JordanTLTianyi LinZZZhengyuan Zhou

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Feasible Online Learning with Gradient Feedback Online gradient descent (OGD) is well-known to be doubly optimal under strong convexity or monotonicity assumptions: (1) in the single-agent setting, it achieves an optimal regret of Formula: see text for strongly convex cost functions, and (2) in the multiagent setting of strongly monotone games with each agent employing OGD we obtain last-iterate convergence of the joint action to a unique Nash equilibrium at an optimal rate of Formula: see text. Whereas these finite-time guarantees highlight its merits, OGD has the drawback that it requires knowing the strong convexity/monotonicity parameters. In “Adaptive, Doubly Optimal No-Regret Learning in Strongly Monotone and Exp-Concave Games with Gradient Feedback,” M. Jordan, T. Lin, and Z. Zhou design a fully adaptive OGD algorithm, AdaOGD, that does not require a priori knowledge of these parameters. In the single-agent setting, the algorithm achieves Formula: see text regret under strong convexity, which is optimal up to a log factor. Further, if each agent employs AdaOGD in strongly monotone games, the joint action converges in a last-iterate sense to a unique Nash equilibrium at a rate of Formula: see text, again optimal up to log factors. The algorithms are illustrated in a learning version of the classic newsvendor problem, in which, because of lost sales, only (noisy) gradient feedback can be observed. The results immediately yield the first feasible and near-optimal algorithm for both the single-retailer and multiretailer settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jordan et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e68bf8b6db643587613bb4https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.0446
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper