PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 22, 2024Energy & Fuels4 citations

Micromechanical Properties of Different Rank Coal and Their Impact on Fracture Compressibility

View Full Paper
YZYang ZhaoTLTing LiuBLBaiquan Lin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The micromechanical properties are crucial factors influencing coal fracturing and efficient gas extraction. This paper employs nanoindentation techniques to investigate coal micromechanical properties across various ranks, analyzing their impact on fracture compressibility. The results indicate significant variations in the distribution of micromechanical parameters of lignite, exhibiting the strongest heterogeneity. Average contact depth and creep displacement follow the order lignite > bituminous coal > anthracite. In terms of average hardness, reduced modulus, and fracture toughness, the ranking is anthracite > bituminous coal > lignite. Guhanshan Mine (GHS) anthracite demonstrates the highest values, exceeding Simengou Mine (SMG) lignite by factors of 2.73, 1.82, and 1.83, respectively. Both hardness and fracture toughness show a significant linear relationship with the elastic modulus. The average fracture compressibility coefficients for Daliuta Mine (DLT), Pingdingshan Mine (PDS), Jiaozishan Mine (JZS), and GHS are 0.144, 0.098, 0.09, and 0.08 MPa–1, respectively. Coal with greater micromechanical strength demonstrates enhanced resistance to compressive deformation fractures. This indicates that higher fracture toughness not only resists fracture propagation but also effectively withstands compressive deformation. Quantitative relationship models between the fracture compressibility coefficient and contact depth, hardness, reduced modulus, and fracture toughness are obtained through fitting analysis. These models facilitate the calculation of coal fracture compressibility coefficients under varying micromechanical strengths. The research findings offer theoretical guidance for optimizing coal seam fracturing and enhancing permeability schemes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e68e76b6db64358761580ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c01552
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Model for Changes in Coalbed Permeability During Primary and Enhanced Methane Recovery2005 · 514 citations
  2. 2Determination of shale macroscale modulus based on microscale measurement: A case study concerning multiscale mechanical characteristics2021 · 89 citations
  3. 3Influence of CO2 adsorption on the strength and elastic modulus of low rank Australian coal under confining pressure2016 · 90 citations
  4. 4Evaluation of the weakening behavior of gas on the coal strength and its quantitative influence on the coal deformation2021 · 72 citations
  5. 5Numerical investigation of the effects of proppant embedment on fracture permeability and well production in Queensland coal seam gas reservoirs2021 · 54 citations