PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2024Transfusion9 citations

Implementation of sexual risk behavior donor screening in Canada

View Full Paper
MGMindy GoldmanALAntoine LewinCRChristian Renaud

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background The two Canadian blood suppliers, Canadian Blood Services and Héma‐Québec, removed the time‐based deferral for men who have sex with men and adopted criteria assessing sexual risk behaviors. We report the impact of these changes on the safety and adequacy of the Canadian blood supply. Study Design and Methods Since 2022, all donors are asked if (1) they have had a new partner and (2) more than one sexual partner in the last 3 months. Donors answering yes to either question are asked if they had anal sex in the last 3 months; if yes, they are deferred for 3 months. We followed HIV rates for the 18 months before and 14 (Héma‐Québec) or 18 months (Canadian Blood Services) post‐implementation and interviewed HIV‐positive whole blood donors. We assessed the number and characteristics of whole blood donors answering yes to the two first questions with or without deferral. Results There were four HIV‐positive donations out of 1,492,355 donations pre‐implementation and four out of 1,447,772 post‐implementation (0.27/100,000 vs. 0.28/100,000, p = 1.00). Post‐implementation, one HIV‐positive donor was non‐compliant with multiple criteria, no risk factors were identified in the others. 3.2% of donors answered yes to questions (1) and/or (2); 0.17% were deferred for a new partner and/or more than one partner and anal sex. Deferral rates were highest in first time, younger donors, and similar in males and females. Conclusion Implementation of sexual risk behavior donor screening resulted in unchanged HIV rates to date and a manageable deferral rate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Goldman et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e69852b6db64358761e7a2https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17878
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Screening for high‐risk sexual behavior in Canada2022 · 8 citations
  2. 2Validation of new, gender‐neutral questions on recent sexual behaviors among plasma donors and men who have sex with men2022 · 4 citations
  3. 3Cognitive evaluation of the AABB U niform D onor H istory Q uestionnaire2016 · 42 citations
  4. 4Donor criteria for men who have sex with men: a C anadian perspective2014 · 17 citations
  5. 5Evolving the gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men time‐based deferral to sexual risk screening for all donors: The contribution of Canadian research programmes2023 · 9 citations