PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2024˜Al-œMukhtar journal of engineering research.0 citationsOpen Access

Simulation Of Dehydration Process By Using Ethylene Glycol Butyl Ether (Egbe)

View Full Paper
AMAbdualfatah S. MahmodAHAbdrabba I. HassanRARasha A. Alabd

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The raw natural gas extracted from production wells contains many impurities such as oil, sulphur, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and other impurities. Among these impurities that must be removed in order to achieve the specifications of the liquid natural gas (LNG) is a water vapor. Because free water causes hydrate formation in transport pipelines and in addition to corrosion when combine with acid gases, resulting in heavy losses in maintenance costs of transport pipelines. For these reasons, natural gas must be dehydrated. The most common methods is Glycol dehydration process, and this process has a good results. In this paper, we have suggested a solvent and simulated it and proof its effectiveness in dissolving the water and dehydration the gas instead of using Tri-ethylene Glycol (TEG). This solvent is Ethylene Glycol Butyl Ether (EGBE), It is used widely as a solvent in surface coatings, and used in metal and household cleaners. It isn’t use in previously natural gas processing. The comparison between glycol types done by Aspen Hysys (glycol package model approach) and according to the dry gas specifications, the simulation results show that: the appropriate flow rate for EG, DEG, TEG, TREG and EGBE are 500 Kgmol/h, 429. 5 Kgmol/h, 337. 1 Kgmol/h, 80 Kgmol/h and 25. 3 Kgmol/h, respectively. Ethylene Glycol Butyl Ether prove a high the efficiency it in dissolving the water with a little flow rate, as well as decrease the energy required for the operation. This paper looks to the use of EGBE as an alternative to TEG for its high efficacy in dissolving water, also significant decrease in the cost of dehydration gas about 98. 7 x 109 /Year].

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mahmod et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6a4e8b6db643587627e9ehttps://doi.org/10.54172/14qx1748
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Technical Evaluation of BTEX Emission Mitigation from Gas Dehydration Unit by Revamping and Using Alternative Glycols2025
  2. 2Analysis Study of Available Alternatives for Mitigation of Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Glycol Dehydration Unit2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Determination of Dissolved BTEX in Glycol Dehydrators by Developing an In-House Technique2024
  4. 4Design modification and comparative analysis of glycol‐based natural gas dehydration plant2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Mechanistic Modeling of TEG Dehydrator Emissions in Oil and Gas Industry2026