PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2024Communications Medicine23 citationsOpen Access

A comprehensive AI model development framework for consistent Gleason grading

View Full Paper
XHXinmi HuoKOKok Haur OngKLKah Weng Lau

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background Artificial Intelligence(AI)-based solutions for Gleason grading hold promise for pathologists, while image quality inconsistency, continuous data integration needs, and limited generalizability hinder their adoption and scalability. Methods We present a comprehensive digital pathology workflow for AI-assisted Gleason grading. It incorporates A!MagQC (image quality control), A!HistoClouds (cloud-based annotation), Pathologist-AI Interaction (PAI) for continuous model improvement, Trained on Akoya-scanned images only, the model utilizes color augmentation and image appearance migration to address scanner variations. We evaluate it on Whole Slide Images (WSI) from another five scanners and conduct validations with pathologists to assess AI efficacy and PAI. Results Our model achieves an average F1 score of 0.80 on annotations and 0.71 Quadratic Weighted Kappa on WSIs for Akoya-scanned images. Applying our generalization solution increases the average F1 score for Gleason pattern detection from 0.73 to 0.88 on images from other scanners. The model accelerates Gleason scoring time by 43% while maintaining accuracy. Additionally, PAI improve annotation efficiency by 2.5 times and led to further improvements in model performance. Conclusions This pipeline represents a notable advancement in AI-assisted Gleason grading for improved consistency, accuracy, and efficiency. Unlike previous methods limited by scanner specificity, our model achieves outstanding performance across diverse scanners. This improvement paves the way for its seamless integration into clinical workflows.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huo et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6ad90b6db64358762f366https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00502-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Randomized controlled trial of a 12-week digital care program in improving low back pain2018 · 367 citations
  2. 2Independent validation of paige prostate: Assessing clinical benefit of an artificial intelligence tool within a digital diagnostic pathology laboratory workflow.2020 · 13 citations
  3. 3Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview2021 · 5,818 citations
  4. 4Computational pathological identification of prostate cancer following neoadjuvant treatment.2020 · 7 citations
  5. 5Tree-structured grading of pathological images of prostate2005 · 29 citations