PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2024Journal of Forecasting0 citations

Are professional forecasters inattentive to public discussions about inflation? The case of Argentina

View Full Paper
JAJ. Daniel AromíMLMartín Llada

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract We evaluate whether professional forecasters incorporate valuable information from public discussions on social media. The study covers the case of inflation in Argentina for the period 2016–2022. We find solid evidence consistent with inattention. A simple indicator of attention to inflation on social media is shown to anticipate professional forecast errors. A one standard deviation increment in the indicator is followed by a rise of 0.4% in mean forecast errors in the subsequent month and by a cumulative increment of 0.7% over the next 6 months. Furthermore, social media content anticipates significant revisions in forecasts that target multiple months ahead inflation and calendar year inflation. These findings are different from previously documented forms of inattention. Consistent results are verified by implementing out‐of‐sample forecasts and using content from an alternative social network. The study has implications for the use of professional forecasts in the context of policymaking and sheds new evidence on the nature of imperfect information in macroeconomics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aromí et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6aeb0b6db64358763091bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/for.3141
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper