PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2024Taxon6 citations

A revised tribal classification of Papaveraceae (poppy family) based on molecular and morphological data

View Full Paper
HPHuan‐Wen PengKXKun‐Li XiangLLLian Lian

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Papaveraceae, commonly known as the poppy family, contains many species with horticultural and/or pharmaceutical importance and has been the subject of various molecular studies. However, a widely accepted tribal classification for Papaveraceae remains lacking. In this study, we used a sampling covering all 48 of the currently recognized genera of Papaveraceae. Our study is to employ broad morphological data in combination with sequence data from two nuclear and seven plastid DNA regions to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships within the family. Our analyses indicate that Pteridophylloideae is sister to the clade containing Hypecooideae and Fumarioideae, and these three lineages are in turn sister to Papaveroideae. The alternative topologies constraining Pteridophylloideae as sister to the other poppy species, to Papaveroideae or to Hypecooideae, as recovered in previous studies, are all rejected. Fumarioideae contains nine main clades, and Fumarieae is nested in traditional Corydaleae. Within Papaveroideae, three main clades are recovered and Platystemoneae is embedded within traditional Papavereae. Both topologies constraining traditional Corydaleae or Papavereae as monophyletic are significantly rejected. Within this phylogenetic framework, the evolution of selected characters is inferred and diagnostic morphological characters at different taxonomic levels are identified and discussed. Based on morphological and molecular evidence, a new tribal classification of Papaveraceae is presented, in which 4 subfamilies, 14 tribes (including 7 newly described tribes), and 43 genera are recognized.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peng et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6b01bb6db643587631753https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13175
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses2016 · 5,443 citations
  2. 2Flowering Plants2009 · 327 citations
  3. 3The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools1997 · 39,314 citations
  4. 4RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models2006 · 16,004 citations
  5. 5Angiosperm Phylogeny Inferred from 18S Ribosomal DNA Sequences1997 · 432 citations