PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2024The Astrophysical Journal10 citationsOpen Access

Bulk Flow Motion Detection in the Local Universe with Pantheon+ Type Ia Supernovae

View Full Paper
MLMaria LopesABArmando BernuiCFCamila Franco

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The bulk flow in the Local Universe is a collective phenomenon due to the peculiar motions of matter structures, which, instead of moving in random directions, appears to follow an approximate dipole velocity flow. We apply a directional analysis to investigate, through the Hubble-Lema\^tre diagram, the angular dependence of the Hubble constant H₀ of a sample of Type Ia Supernovae from the Pantheon+ catalog in the Local Universe (0. 015 z 0. 06). We perform a directional analysis that reveals a statistically significant dipole variation of H₀, at more than 99. 9\% confidence level, showing that matter structures follow a dipole bulk flow motion towards (l, b) = (326. ¹ 11. ², 27. ⁸ 11. ²), close to the Shapley supercluster (l₀. ₆ₒ₇₀₏₋₄ₘ, b₀. ₆ₒ₇₀₏₋₄ₘ) = (311. ⁵, 32. ³), with velocity 132. 14 109. 3 km s^-1 at the effective distance 102. 83 10. 2~Mpc. Interestingly, the antipodal direction of this dipole points close to the Dipole Repeller structure. Our analyses confirm that the gravitational dipole system Shapley-Dipole Repeller explains well the observed bulk flow velocity field in the Local Universe. Furthermore, we performed robustness tests that support our results. Additionally, our approach provides a measurement of the Hubble constant H₀ = 70. 39 1. 4~km s^-1 Mpc^{-1}, at the effective distance 102. 8~Mpc, z 0. 025. Note that this value was obtained using the first order approximation of the Hubble law because our methodology is model-independent. If one assumes, for instance, cosmography at second order with the CDM value q₀ = -0. 55, which is a model-dependent hypothesis, then H₀ = 72. 6 1. 5 km s^-1 Mpc^-1, but our results: bulk flow velocity, dipole direction and its statistical significance remain the same.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lopes et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c033b6db64358763f8dchttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad3735
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Observer Bulk Flow as an Alternative Explanation for Apparent Cosmic Acceleration2026
  2. 2Observer Bulk Flow as an Alternative Explanation for Apparent Cosmic Acceleration2026
  3. 3Cosmological Inference from within the Peculiar Local Universe2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4The local expansion field is not isotropic: directional variation of H0 explains ~50% of the Hubble tension2026
  5. 5No evidence for local <i>H</i> 0 anisotropy from Tully–Fisher or supernova distances2025