PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2024Scientific Reports5 citationsOpen Access

Global hyperperfusion after successful endovascular thrombectomy is linked to worse outcome in acute ischemic stroke

View Full Paper
WYWookjin YangJKJeong‐Min KimCSChul‐Ho Sohn

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Patients with stroke may develop hyperperfusion after a successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). However, the relationship between post-EVT hyperperfusion and clinical outcomes remains unclear and requires further clarification. We reviewed consecutive patients with anterior circulation occlusion who were successfully recanalized with EVT. Based on post-EVT arterial spin-labeling images, hyperperfusion was categorized as follows: global hyperperfusion (GHP), increased cerebral blood flow (CBF) in ≥ 50% of the culprit vessel territory; focal hyperperfusion (FHP), increased CBF in < 50% of the culprit vessel territory; no hyperperfusion (NHP), no discernible CBF increase. Factors associated with hyperperfusion were assessed, and clinical outcomes were compared among patients under different hyperperfusion categories. Among 131 patients, 25 and 40 patients developed GHP and FHP, respectively. Compared to other groups, the GHP group had worse National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (GHP vs. NHP/FHP, 18.1 ± 7.4 vs. 12.3 ± 6.0; p < 0.001), a larger post-EVT infarct volume (98.9 42.3-132.7 vs. 13.5 5.0-34.1 mL; p < 0.001), and a worse 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale, 3 1-4 vs. 2 0-3; p = 0.030). GHP was independently associated with infarct volume (B = 0.532, standard error = 0.163, p = 0.001), and infarct volume was a major mediator of the association of GHP with unfavorable outcomes (total effect: β = 0.176, p = 0.034; direct effect: β = 0.045, p = 0.64; indirect effect: β = 0.132, p = 0.017). Patients presenting with post-EVT GHP had poorer neurological prognosis, which is likely mediated by a large infarct volume.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c326b6db643587641c5fhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60623-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Refining Angiographic Biomarkers of Revascularization2013 · 219 citations
  2. 2Collaterals are a major determinant of the core but not the penumbra volume in acute ischemic stroke2019 · 49 citations
  3. 3Intensive blood pressure control after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke (ENCHANTED2/MT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial2022 · 263 citations
  4. 4The Clinical and Radiographic Importance of Distinguishing Partial from Near-Complete Reperfusion Following Intra-Arterial Stroke Therapy2012 · 56 citations
  5. 5Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II)1998 · 3,680 citations