PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2024Gland Surgery1 citationsOpen Access

Baseline circulating tumor DNA predicts long-term survival outcomes for patients with early breast cancer

View Full Paper
XZXiangui ZhangRFRui FengYXYaqian Xu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a potential biomarker not only capable of monitoring the treatment response during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) or rescue therapy, but also identifying minimal residual disease (MRD) and detecting early relapses after primary treatment. However, it remains uncertain whether the detection of ctDNA at diagnosis, before any treatment, can predict the prognosis for patients with early breast cancer. The objective of our study was to evaluate the predictive value of baseline ctDNA for prognosis in patients with early breast cancer. Methods: A total of 90 patients with early breast cancer and 24 healthy women were recruited between August 2016 and October 2016. Peripheral blood samples were collected from patients at diagnosis, before any treatment. Blood samples were processed and subjected to targeted deep sequencing with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 1,021 cancer-related genes. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) were reported. Results: The 90 patients with breast cancer included 6 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 84 patients with invasive breast cancer. Within the cohort of patients with invasive breast cancer, ctDNA were detected in 57 patients, with a ctDNA detection rate of 67.9%. Meanwhile, no ctDNA was detected in DCIS patients. Among 84 patients with invasive breast cancer, patients with high-level ctDNA had a significantly lower RFS compared to patients with low-level ctDNA (log-rank P=0.0036). Conclusions: Our study suggested that ctDNA at diagnosis, before any treatment, could potentially serve as a biomarker to predict the prognosis for patients with early breast cancer. However, further follow-up and more studies with large sample sizes are required to confirm these findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c49ab6db643587642e7ehttps://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-115
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Proposal for Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trials: The STEEP System2007 · 895 citations
  2. 2Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform2009 · 63,785 citations
  3. 3Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration2012 · 385 citations
  4. 4Plasma DNA integrity as a biomarker for primary and metastatic breast cancer and potential marker for early diagnosis2014 · 162 citations
  5. 5Elevated level of cell-free plasma DNA is associated with breast cancer2007 · 71 citations