PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2024International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics0 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of effectiveness of intraoperative subperiosteal versus periarticular analgesic cocktail injection for post operative analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

View Full Paper
DJDijo P. JoySESamson Samuel E.PJP. S. John

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: Early postoperative pain management is pivotal in patients undergoing Total knee arthroplasty. The advantage of Local infiltration analgesia is its ability to provide control of pain without interfering with motor strength of the lower extremity, thereby allowing early mobilization of patients. This study compares the effectiveness of local analgesic cocktail injection given through subperiosteal vs. periarticular routes. Methods: The study included 30 patients admitted for primary total knee arthroplasty. They were grouped into two groups based on different injection sites. Group A included patients who received subperiosteal injection and Group B included patients who received periarticular injection, under spinal anaesthesia. The difference in pain among the two groups, using VAS at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hrs postoperatively, postoperative range of movements, and Functional outcome using IKDC score at the end of 6 months were assessed and compared between the two groups. Results: The mean VAS scores at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hrs were 0.87±0.35, 1.47±0.52, 1.80±0.41, 1.07±0.46 in subperiosteal group and 2.00±0.53, 2.47±0.52, 2.80±0.56, 1.93±0.59 in periarticular group. The 6 months postoperative IKDC scores were 51.34±0.41 and 51.04±0.61 respectively. Conclusions: Subperiosteal cocktail injection can significantly reduce the postoperative pain and result in early recovery of range of movements, compared with periarticular cocktail injection in patients undergoing Total knee arthroplasty. But the long-term functional outcomes were comparable among both the groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Joy et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6d1b2b6db64358764fd46https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20241111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dose intraarticular steroid injection increase the rate of infection in subsequent arthroplasty: grading the evidence through a meta-analysis2014 · 50 citations
  2. 2Multimodal Pain Management after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center2009 · 329 citations
  3. 3Peri-articular injections of local anaesthesia can replace patient-controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled study2015 · 39 citations
  4. 4A new improvement: subperiosteal cocktail application to effectively reduce pain and blood loss after total knee arthroplasty2020 · 12 citations
  5. 5Controlling Pain After Total Hip And Knee Arthroplasty Using a Multimodal Protocol With Local Periarticular Injections: A Prospective, Randomized Study2007 · 43 citations