PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2024Vestnik of Samara University History pedagogics philology2 citationsOpen Access

Impact of prominence type on the coarticulation of vowels following palatalized consonants

View Full Paper
SBSergey Batalin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The quantitative impact of prominence (neutral vs emphatic stress) on the coarticulation of the Russian low æ, mid e and high i front vowels is evaluated in CV sequences with palatalized consonants of various places of obstruction. The research is conditioned by the aims of speech synthesis and recognition of the Russian language, the current data in the field being insufficient. First order linear equations (locus equations) are used to evaluate the degree of CV coarticulation. The experiment is performed on CjVCjV nonsense words imbedded in the middle position of a carrier phrase «Vyros CVCV sjyljnym» («CjVCjV has grown up strong»). The first syllable of the target words was uttered both with neutral and emphatic stress. The Praat software was used to measure F2 formant values at vowel onsets and central parts. It was established that linear regression slopes are similar both in the Y-intercepts and slope coefficients for the palatalized consonants of various places of obstruction uttered with the same prominence. The degree of coarticulation was different depending upon the type of prominence (neutral or emphatic): the coefficients were lower in case of the emphatic stress compared to those of the neutral one. ANOVA analysis and Student’s t-test were performed to reveal the difference in F2 values of vowel onsets and middle parts as a function of the vowel openness and type of prominence. The results obtained were interpreted based on the degree of the openness of the vowels under study: an open vowel under emphatic stress tends to expand its vowel space by a backward displacement while close vowels tend to move forward in the mouth cavity when pronounced with emphatic stress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sergey Batalin (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6e1e2b6db64358765d86ahttps://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2024-30-1-122-130
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Progressive Coarticulation and Emphatic Stress in Russian VCV Structures2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2The specifics of coarticulation in Chinese and Russian syllables with a palatalized consonant2024
  3. 3V-to-V Coarticulation Induced Acoustic and Articulatory Variability of Vowels: The Effect of Pitch-Accent2019 · 2 citations
  4. 4Articulation and acoustic characteristics of unstressed and stressed vowels in place of the spelling "a" in the speech of native speakers of different phonovariants of the Russian language2024
  5. 5Bidirectional C-to-V coarticulation across syllable and word boundaries2024