PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 20, 20240 citationsOpen Access

Identifying marine invasion threats and management priorities through introduction pathway analysis in a remote sub-Antarctic ecosystem

View Full Paper
DBDaniel T. I. BayleyPBPaul E. BrewinRJRoss James

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The threat from novel marine species introductions is a global issue. When Non-native marine species are introduced to novel environments and become invasive, they can affect biodiversity, industry, ecosystem function, and both human and wildlife health. Isolated areas with sensitive or highly specialised endemic species can be particularly impacted. The global increase in the scope of tourism activities together with a rapidly changing climate, now put these remote ecosystems under threat. In this context, we analyse invasion pathways into South Georgia & the South Sandwich Islands (SGSSI) for marine non-native species via vessel biofouling. The SGSSI archipelago has high biodiversity and endemism, and has historically been highly isolated from the South American mainland. The islands sit just below the Polar Front temperature boundary, affording some protection against introductions. However, the region is now warming and SGSSI increasingly acts as a gateway port for vessel traffic into the wider Antarctic, amplifying invasion likelihood. We use remote AIS vessel-tracking data over a two-year period to map vessel movement and behaviour around South Georgia, and across the ‘Scotia Sea’, ‘Magellanic’, and northern ‘Continental High Antarctic’ ecoregions. We find multiple vessel types from locations across the globe frequently now enter shallow inshore waters and stop for prolonged periods (weeks/months) at anchor. Vessels are active throughout the year and stop at multiple port hubs, frequently crossing international waters and ecoregions. Management recommendations to reduce marine invasion likelihood within SGSSI include initiating benthic and hull monitoring at the identified activity/dispersion hubs of King Edward Point, Bay of Isles, Gold Harbour, St Andrews Bay and Stromness Bay. More broadly, regional collaboration and coordination is necessary at neighbouring international ports. Here vessels need increased pre- and post-arrival biosecurity assessment following set protocols, and improved monitoring of hulls for biofouling to pre-emptively mitigate this threat.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bayley et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6e50db6db643587660e3chttps://doi.org/10.22541/au.171365344.41310480/v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A proposed unified framework for biological invasions2011 · 2,600 citations
  2. 2Extreme sensitivity of biological function to temperature in Antarctic marine species2004 · 384 citations
  3. 32023 Guidelines for the control and management of ships’ biofouling to minimize the transfer of invasive aquatic species2024 · 66 citations
  4. 4The igraph software package for complex network research2006 · 10,457 citations
  5. 5The first record of a non-native seaweed from South Georgia and confirmation of its establishment in the Falkland Islands: Ulva fenestrata Postels & Ruprecht2023 · 9 citations