PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2024Education and Information Technologies11 citationsOpen Access

Addressing gender in STEM classrooms: The impact of gender bias on women scientists' experiences in higher education careers in Germany

View Full Paper
DKDana KubeJWJoshua WeidlichKKKarel Kreijns

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Gender bias underlying discrimination against women are particularly salient in STEM higher education. Complementing top-down measures to mitigate these issues identified in the extant literature, we aim to highlight a complementary bottom-up approach. First, to elicit gender stereotypes and gender bias in STEM, we conducted a group concept mapping (GCM) study involving women professors, teaching staff, and scientific staff from different STEM disciplines at German universities ( N = 70). We first asked them to provide statements reflecting their experience in response to the following focus prompt: ‘In my career as a STEM teacher, I experienced gender issues related to:’ Experts were then asked to thematically cluster and rank the statements according to their importance and feasibility with respect to a potential pedagogical intervention that may target these issues. Findings revealed an agreement across STEM disciplines regarding stereotypical beliefs about women, heteronomous gender roles, gender workload, sexism, and structural power relations, in that they remain significant factors for hindering female success in STEM careers in higher education. Based on their experience, however, the women saw potential in working on the awareness of gender bias with pedagogical interventions in online group learning scenarios (CSCL). Statements rated most appropriate were discussed in the light of the aspects of gender bias addressed, with a specific focus on addressing them in collaborative scripts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kube et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6f4bdb6db64358766f2abhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12669-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches2000 · 1,501 citations
  2. 2Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines2015 · 1,546 citations
  3. 3Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review2022 · 744 citations
  4. 4Gender and Colonialism1999 · 81 citations
  5. 5Gender-equal funding rates conceal unequal evaluations2021 · 71 citations