PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2024Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres1 citationsOpen Access

ERA5‐Based Significant Tornado Environments in Canada Between 1980 and 2020

View Full Paper
JHJohn HanesiakMTMateusz TaszarekDWDavid H. Walker

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract This study uses ERA5 close‐proximity soundings and associated convective parameters to characterize significant tornadic storm (F/EF2 + ) environments between 1980 and 2020 in parts of Canada. It is shown that ERA5 convective parameters are suitable to represent observed parameters, based on radiosonde comparisons. Results indicate that the eastern Canadian Prairies have nearly double the lifted condensation level with higher level of free convection compared to eastern Canada (southern Ontario/Quebec). Eastern Canada has more a humid boundary layer and free troposphere that can lead to warmer cold pools, favoring tornadogenesis. Central Canada (Manitoba) has the largest mixed‐layer (ML) convective available potential energy (CAPE) mainly due to a combination of regional differences in low level moisture and steeper mid‐level lapse rates in western Canada. Central continental U.S. and Canadian regions appear to have the highest (most negative) convective inhibition, leading to more explosive initiation. Mean bulk wind shear and storm relative helicity (SRH) increases from west to east, with eastern regions being significantly larger. The supercell composite and significant tornado parameters are generally less than U.S. magnitudes, particularly in western Canada, and would require recalibration for more practical use in Canada. Overall, western Canada significant tornadic storms are associated with more low‐level looping hodographs and dominated by thermodynamic influences compared to larger wind influences in eastern regions. This is likely due to more spring, late summer, and autumn events that typically have well‐developed synoptic systems (stronger wind shear) with overall less buoyant energy in eastern regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hanesiak et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6f60eb6db643587670dechttps://doi.org/10.1029/2023jd040614
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Inter-annual Variability of Moisture Flux from the Prairie Agro-ecosystem: Impact of Crop Phenology on the Seasonal Pattern of Tornado Days2003 · 41 citations
  2. 2Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing1998 · 440 citations
  3. 3The ERA5 global reanalysis2020 · 32,090 citations
  4. 4Composite Soundings Associated with Severe and Tornadic Thunderstorms in Central Alberta2011 · 9 citations
  5. 5Reconstruction of Violent Tornado Environments in Europe: High‐Resolution Dynamical Downscaling of ERA52022 · 21 citations