PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 9, 2024Transplantation Direct5 citationsOpen Access

Benchmark Outcomes in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Multicenter Analysis of 80 996 Transplants From 126 Centers

View Full Paper
GRGianluca RompianesiRMRoberto MontaltiGVGeorgios Vrakas

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background. We defined clinically relevant benchmark values in deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT), to assess the best achievable results in low-risk patient cohorts from experienced centers. Methods. We identified the “ideal” cases from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files from centers performing ≥50 KT per year between 2010 and 2018. Cases have been selected based on the kidney donor profile index values (<35%), a cold ischemia time (CIT) ≤18 h, a HLA mismatch ≤4, and excluding blood group (ABO) incompatible, dual and combined transplants. The outcomes of the benchmark cohort have been compared with a group of patients excluded from the benchmark cohort because but not meeting 1 or more of the abovementioned criteria. Results. The 171 424 KT patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files were screened and 8694 benchmark cases of a total of 80 996 KT (10.7%) from 126 centers meeting the selection criteria were identified. The benchmarks for 1-, 3-, and 5-y patient survival are ≥97%, ≥92.5%, and ≥86.7%, and ≥95.4%, ≥87.8%, and ≥79.6% for graft survival. Benchmark cutoff for hospital length of stay is ≤5 d, ≤23.6% for delayed graft function, and ≤7.5% and ≤9.1% for 6-mo and 1-y incidence of acute rejection. Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y actuarial graft survivals were 96.6%, 91.1%, and 84.2% versus 93.5%, 85.4%, and 75.5% in the benchmark and comparison groups, respectively ( P < 0.001). Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y actuarial patient survivals were 98.1%, 94.8%, and 90.0% versus 96.6%, 91.1%, and 83.0% in the benchmark and comparison groups, respectively ( P < 0.001). Conclusions. For the first time, we quantified the best achievable postoperative results in an ideal scenario in deceased donor KT, aimed at improving the clinical practice guided by the comparison of center performances with the ideal outcomes defined.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rompianesi et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6fcc5b6db643587677286https://doi.org/10.1097/txd.0000000000001618
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Defining Global Benchmarks in Bariatric Surgery2019 · 137 citations
  2. 2Defining Benchmarks for Major Liver Surgery2016 · 225 citations
  3. 3CYCLOSPORIN A INITIALLY AS THE ONLY IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT IN 34 RECIPIENTS OF CADAVERIC ORGANS: 32 KIDNEYS, 2 PANCREASES, AND 2 LIVERS1979 · 1,098 citations
  4. 4Special Issue: KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients2009 · 1,490 citations
  5. 5Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS. Final rule.1999 · 30 citations