PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2024Joint Bone Spine6 citationsOpen Access

Retention of triple therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine compared to combination methotrexate and leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis

View Full Paper
SBSankalp Virendrakumar BhavsarMMMohammad MovahediACAngela Cesta

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Objective: There are various combination conventional synthetic disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) treatment strategies used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A commonly used csDMARD combination is triple therapy with methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Another approach is double therapy with MTX and leflunomide (LEF). We compared the real-world retention of these two treatment combinations. Methods: Patients with RA from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) who received triple or double therapy on or after OBRI enrolment were included. Retention rates were compared between these two groups. We also analyzed which medication in the combination was discontinued and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. Disease activity was assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation as well as at time of discontinuation. Risk factors for treatment discontinuation were also examined. Results: 692 patients were included (258 triple and 434 double therapy). There were 175 (67.8%) discontinuations in the triple therapy group and 287 (66.1%) discontinuations in patients on double therapy. The median survival for triple therapy was longer (15.1 months; 95% CI: 11.2-21.2) compared to double therapy (9.6 months; 95%CI: 7.03-12.2). However, this was not statistically significant. Disease activity at 6 and 12 months, measured by 28-joint count Disease Activity Score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was lower with triple therapy (mean DAS28 at 6 months 3.4 vs. 3.9, p<0.0001 and at 12 months 3.2 vs. 3.5, p=0.0005). Conclusion: Patients on triple therapy remained on treatment longer than patients on double therapy. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bhavsar et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7044fb6db64358767dbf9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105732
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Safety and retention of combination triple disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs in new‐onset rheumatoid arthritis2015 · 15 citations
  2. 2Effects of Abatacept in Patients with Methotrexate-Resistant Active Rheumatoid Arthritis2006 · 716 citations
  3. 3Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Methotrexate Alone, Sulfasalazine and Hydroxychloroquine, or a Combination of All Three Medications1996 · 655 citations
  4. 4Agreement between Rheumatologist and Patient-reported Adherence to Methotrexate in a US Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry2016 · 15 citations
  5. 5Combination leflunomide and methotrexate in refractory rheumatoid arthritis: a biologic sparing approach2016 · 23 citations