PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 2, 2024Acta Haematologica Polonica2 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of colonization and infection profile in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients

View Full Paper
KKKinga KrawiecPSPiotr StrzałkaKSKamila Stańczak

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Introduction: Infections are one of the main causes of death after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Material and methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of colonization and infection epidemiology in 44 patients who underwent matched related donor (MRD) allo-HSCT between 2012 and 2022. Results: Colonization was observed in 84.1% of patients before allo-HSCT. The most common location was the anus, colonized in 55.4% of patients, mostly by Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL (+) — 28.6%. Multi-drug resistant bacteria (MDR) accounted for 50.7% of positive colonization cultures before allo-HSCT. In the post-transplantation period (i.e. up to 100 days after allo-HSCT), infections occurred in 86.4% of patients. Bacteremia was observed in 47.7% of patients, mostly caused by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis — 39.4%. Infection of the skin and soft tissue near the central line was found in 27.3% of patients, urinary tract infections in 56.8%, and gastrointestinal infections in 38.6%. Fungal infections were reported in 31.8%. MDR pathogens accounted for 58.1% of all infecting pathogens. The most common resistance was extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), accounting for 50.8% of all MDR strains. Viral reactivations were detected in 29.5%. 59.5% of colonized patients developed an infection with the pathogen responsible for their previous colonization. Infections with such pathogens were significantly more frequent in colonized patients than with de novo pathogens (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Colonization evaluation can be an effective tool to identify patients with a high risk of developing post-transplant infections with the colonizing pathogen, potentially resulting in a prompter implementation of targeted treatment and improved infection outcome.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krawiec et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70b47b6db64358768532chttps://doi.org/10.5603/ahp.98671
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper