PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2024Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental Translational and Clinical7 citationsOpen Access

Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is safe and well tolerated by people living with MS – outcomes of the phase I randomised controlled trial (TAURUS)

View Full Paper
PNPhuong Tram NguyenAZAmin ZarghamiKMKalina Makowiecki

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), delivered as a daily intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) for four consecutive weeks, increased the number of new oligodendrocytes in the adult mouse brain. Therefore, rTMS holds potential as a remyelinating intervention for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective Primarily to determine the safety and tolerability of our rTMS protocol in people with MS. Secondary objectives include feasibility, blinding and an exploration of changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and cognitive or motor performance. Methods A randomised (2:1), placebo controlled, single blind, parallel group, phase 1 trial of 20 rTMS sessions (600 iTBS pulses per hemisphere; 25% maximum stimulator output), delivered over 4–5 weeks. Twenty participants were randomly assigned to ‘sham’ ( n = 7) or active rTMS ( n = 13), with the coil positioned at 90° or 0°, respectively. Results Five adverse events (AEs) including one serious AE reported. None were related to treatment. Protocol compliance was high (85%) and blinding successful. Within participant MRI metrics, PROMs and cognitive or motor performance were unchanged over time. Conclusion Twenty sessions of rTMS is safe and well tolerated in a small group of people with MS. The study protocol and procedures are feasible. Improvement of sham is warranted before further investigating safety and efficacy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nguyen et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70daab6db6435876879f3https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173241252571
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Activity‐dependent central nervous system myelination throughout life2018 · 98 citations
  2. 2Improvement of hand dexterity following motor cortex rTMS in multiple sclerosis patients with cerebellar impairment2008 · 71 citations
  3. 3Magnetization transfer ratio in the delayed-release dimethyl fumarate DEFINE study2014 · 43 citations
  4. 4Diffusion tensor MRI as a biomarker in axonal and myelin damage2013 · 360 citations
  5. 5A smartphone sensor-based digital outcome assessment of multiple sclerosis2021 · 116 citations