PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2024Noumerico Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education0 citationsOpen Access

Profile of Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Students of SMK Ma'wataibin Pagelaran in Solving Problems of Arithmetic Rows and Rows

View Full Paper
UHUcik Fitri HandayaniRSRisma Cahya Setiawati

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study describes the profile of students' mathematical reasoning ability in solving arithmetic rows and series problems. Based on the results of observations and interviews with the mathematics teacher of class X SMK Ma'wataibin Pagelaran Malang, information was obtained that 83% of students in the class tended not to be able to conclude the answer. This descriptive research uses a qualitative approach. The sample of this research is 19 students of class X SMK Ma'wataibin Pagelaran. They then selected one each in the high, medium, and low-level categories. Then, interviews were conducted with each subject to explore deeper information. The test instrument used is 1 question that contains four indicators of mathematical reasoning ability. The test results obtained that students in the high mathematical reasoning ability category amounted to 7 students, with a percentage of 36.85%. Students in the moderate mathematical reasoning ability category amounted to 8 students, with a rate of 42.10%. Students in the low mathematical reasoning ability category amounted to 4 students, with a rate of 21.05%. Based on the results of the data analysis, it is shown that high-category students fulfill four indicators of reasoning ability according to their abilities. Medium-category students correctly fulfill three indicators of mathematical reasoning ability: writing conjectures, doing work, and providing reasons/evidence. Low-category students only fulfill one indicator of mathematical reasoning ability, namely writing conjectures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Handayani et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e718dfb6db643587691e0chttps://doi.org/10.33367/jtme.v2i1.5151
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analisis Kemampuan Siswa Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Literasi Numerasi2022 · 63 citations
  2. 2Desain Didaktis Penalaran Matematis untuk Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMP pada Luas dan Volume Limas2015 · 41 citations
  3. 3ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA PADA KELAS XI BUDAYA DI SMAK St. FRANSISKUS ASISI LARANTUKA2021 · 2 citations
  4. 4Kepemimpinan Visioner Kepala Sekolah Terhadap Mutu dan Kualitas Sekolah di SD Negeri Soko2021 · 25 citations
  5. 5Special education and subject teachers’ self‐perceived readiness to teach mathematics to low‐performing middle school students2017 · 14 citations