PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2024Cureus1 citationsOpen Access

External Validation of the Oakland Score for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

View Full Paper
IRIsmail RaqiPPPascal PotierJLJean-Paul Lagasse

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Introduction Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) presents challenges in emergency settings, with incidence influenced by demographic shifts and anticoagulant usage. The Oakland score aids in risk stratification for safe discharge based on clinical and laboratory parameters. However, external validation remains limited. Methods This study validated the Oakland score in a French cohort of patients with acute LGIB and assessed the discriminatory value of the score using the area under the curve (AUC) and then its sensitivity and specificity. Results A retrospective examination of 343 patient records that satisfied the inclusion criteria showed a median score of 14 points and good discriminatory capacity (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve: 0.83). There was low sensitivity (20.9%) for safe discharge but good specificity (98.5%) when using an 8-point threshold. With a 9-point threshold, the sensitivity was increased to 36.5%, while the specificity remained at 95%. Conclusion Identifying low-risk LGIB patients is accomplished without sacrificing sensitivity by increasing the Oakland score threshold to 9 points. This modification improves patient safety and resource allocation in the emergency room and has been verified by other large series. For wider implementation, additional validation and long-term outcome evaluations are required.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raqi et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e71aaab6db643587693cafhttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57264
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper