PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 29, 2024Clinical Endoscopy2 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence and natural course of incidental gastric subepithelial tumors

View Full Paper
DHDae-Hyuk HeoMYMin A YangJSJae Sun Song

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) are often encountered during the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening. We assessed the prevalence of gastric SETs and the risk factors for their progression.Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of 30,754 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening at our medical center between January 2013 and December 2016.Results: Among the 30,754 patients examined, 599 (1.94%) had gastric SETs. The prevalence increased with age and was 9.56% in patients aged ≥70 years. In total, 262 patients underwent serial endoscopy for more than 6 months. The median age was 68 years (interquartile range IQR, 61–74), and the number of females was 167 (63.7%). During a median follow-up of 58 months (IQR, 38–75), 22 patients (8.4%) showed significant changes in tumor size. An irregular border (odds ratio, 4.623; 95% confidence interval, 1.093–19.558; p=0.037) was a significant risk factor for progression. Seven patients underwent surgical or endoscopic resections. The pathologies of gastric SETs included leiomyomas (n=3), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n=2), and lipomas (n=2).Conclusions: The prevalence of gastric SETs increases with age. Most gastric SETs do not progress during long-term endoscopic examinations, and the risk of an increase in size is low in asymptomatic small SETs without irregular borders.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heo et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e71cb7b6db64358769630ahttps://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.124
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper