PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 2024Journal of Clinical Oncology17 citationsOpen Access

Pack-Year Smoking History: An Inadequate and Biased Measure to Determine Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility

View Full Paper
APAlexandra L. PotterNXNuo XuPSPriyanka Senthil

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE Pack-year smoking history is an imperfect and biased measure of cumulative tobacco exposure. The use of pack-year smoking history to determine lung cancer screening eligibility in the current US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guideline may unintentionally exclude many high-risk individuals, especially those from racial and ethnic minority groups. It is unclear whether using a smoking duration cutoff instead of a smoking pack-year cutoff would improve the selection of individuals for screening. METHODS We analyzed 49,703 individuals with a smoking history from the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) and 22,126 individuals with a smoking history from the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) to assess eligibility for screening under the USPSTF guideline versus a proposed guideline that replaces the ≥20-pack-year criterion with a ≥20-year smoking duration criterion. Results Under the USPSTF guideline, only 57.6% of Black patients with lung cancer in the SCCS would have qualified for screening, whereas a significantly higher percentage of White patients with lung cancer (74.0%) would have qualified ( P < .001). Under the proposed guideline, the percentage of Black and White patients with lung cancer who would have qualified for screening increased to 85.3% and 82.0%, respectively, eradicating the disparity in screening eligibility between the groups. In the BWHS, using a 20-year smoking duration cutoff instead of a 20-pack-year cutoff increased the percentage of Black women with lung cancer who would have qualified for screening from 42.5% to 63.8%. Conclusion Use of a 20-year smoking duration cutoff instead of a 20-pack-year cutoff greatly increases the proportion of patients with lung cancer who would qualify for screening and eliminates the racial disparity in screening eligibility between Black versus White individuals; smoking duration has the added benefit of being easier to calculate and being a more precise assessment of smoking exposure compared with pack-year smoking history.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Potter et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e720ddb6db64358769af94https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.23.01780
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Association of Long-term, Low-Intensity Smoking With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in the National Institutes of Health–AARP Diet and Health Study2016 · 219 citations
  2. 2Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening2011 · 11,211 citations
  3. 3Demographic Characteristics, Cigarette Smoking, and e-Cigarette Use Among US Adults2020 · 171 citations
  4. 4Active and Passive Smoking and the Incidence of Asthma in the Black Women’s Health Study2014 · 103 citations
  5. 5The association of race with timeliness of care and survival among Veterans Affairs health care system patients with late-stage non-small cell lung cancer2013 · 26 citations