PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 20242 citationsOpen Access

Screening and characterization of 133 physiologically-relevant environmental chemicals for reproductive toxicity

View Full Paper
GUGurugowtham UlaganathanHJHui JiangNCNoah Canio

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reproduction is a functional outcome that relies on complex cellular, tissue, and organ interactions that span the developmental period to adulthood. Thus, the assessment of its disruption by environmental chemicals is remarkably painstaking in conventional toxicological animal models and does not scale up to the number of chemicals present in our environment and requiring testing. We adapted a previously described low-throughput in vivo chromosome segregation assay using C. elegans predictive of reproductive toxicity and leveraged available public data sources (ToxCast, ICE) to screen and characterize 133 physiologically-relevant chemicals in a high-throughput manner. The screening outcome was further validated in a second, independent in vivo assay assessing embryonic viability. In total, 13 chemicals were classified as reproductive toxicants with the two most active chemicals belonging to the large family of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (QACs) commonly used as disinfectants but with limited available reproductive toxicity data. We compared the results from the C. elegans assay with ToxCast in vitro data compiled from 700+ cell response assays and 300+ signaling pathways-based assays. We did not observe a difference in the bioactivity or in average potency (AC50) between the top and bottom chemicals. However, the intended target categories were significantly different between the classified chemicals with, in particular, an over-representation of steroid hormone targets for the high Z-score chemicals. Taken together, these results point to the value of in vivo models that scale to high-throughput level for reproductive toxicity assessment and to the need to prioritize the assessment of QACs impacts on reproduction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ulaganathan et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e72303b6db64358769c99ahttps://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.22.584808
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 Is Required for Both Normal and Radiation-Induced Meiotic Crossing Over but Not for Completion of Meiosis2000 · 266 citations
  2. 2Studies on the topical treatment of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis: the therapeutic effect of methyl benzethonium chloride and the aminoglycosides, gentamicin and paromomycin1989 · 15 citations
  3. 3Meiosis in mammals: recombination, non-disjunction and the environment2006 · 33 citations
  4. 4Effects of 17.BETA.-Estradiol, Bisphenol A and Tributyltin Chloride on Germ Cells of Caenorhabditis elegans2003 · 43 citations
  5. 5Nuclear hormone receptors in C. elegans2006 · 94 citations