PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 27, 20240 citationsOpen Access

Strengthening implementation of integrated care for small and nutritionally at-risk infants under six months: pre-trial feasibility study

View Full Paper
MMMarie McGrathSGShimelis GirmaMBMelkamu Berhane

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract An integrated care pathway to manage small and nutritionally at-risk infants under 6 months (u6m) and their mothers (MAMI Care Pathway) is consistent with 2023 WHO malnutrition guidelines and is being tested in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in Ethiopia. To optimize trial implementation, we investigated contextual fit with key local stakeholders. We used scenario-based interviews with 17 health workers and four district managers to explore perceived feasibility. Eighteen policymakers were also surveyed to explore policy coherence, demand, acceptability, evidence needs, opportunities and risks. The Bowen feasibility framework and an access to healthcare framework were adapted and applied. Health workers perceived the MAMI Care Pathway as feasible to implement with support to access services and provide care. The approach is acceptable, given consistency with national policies, local protocols and potential to improve routine care quality. Demand for more comprehensive, preventive and person-centred outpatient care was driven by concerns about unmet, hidden and costly care burden for health services and families. Inpatient care for all severe wasting treatment is inaccessible and unacceptable. Support for routine and expanded components, especially maternal mental health, is needed for successful implementation. Wider contextual factors may affect implementation fidelity and strength. Policymakers cautiously welcomed the approach, which resonates with national commitments, policies and plans but need evidence on how it can work within varied, complex contexts without further system overstretch. A responsive, pragmatic RCT will generate the most useful evidence for policymakers. Findings have informed trial preparation and implementation, including a realist evaluation to contextualise outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McGrath et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7230db6db64358769d24dhttps://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.27.24304963
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: Future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation2018 · 495 citations
  2. 2Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework2016 · 1,643 citations
  3. 3Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development2018 · 19,576 citations
  4. 4Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups2007 · 43,571 citations
  5. 5Legal harvest and illegal trade: Trends, challenges, and options in khat production in Ethiopia2016 · 74 citations