PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2024Hydrology Research12 citationsOpen Access

A hybrid deep learning approach for streamflow prediction utilizing watershed memory and process-based modeling

View Full Paper
BYBisrat Ayalew YifruKLKyoung Jae LimJBJoo Hyun Bae

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Accurate streamflow prediction is essential for optimal water management and disaster preparedness. While data-driven methods’ performance often surpasses process-based models, concerns regarding their ‘black-box’ nature persist. Hybrid models, integrating domain knowledge and process modeling into a data-driven framework, offer enhanced streamflow prediction capabilities. This study investigated watershed memory and process modeling-based hybridizing approaches across diverse hydrological regimes – Korean and Ethiopian watersheds. Following watershed memory analysis, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated using the recession constant and other relevant parameters. Three hybrid models, incorporating watershed memory and residual error, were developed and evaluated against standalone long short-term memory (LSTM) models. Hybrids outperformed the standalone LSTM across all watersheds. The memory-based approach exhibited superior and consistent performance across training, evaluation periods, and regions, achieving 17–66% Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient improvement. The residual error-based technique showed varying performance across regions. While hybrids improved extreme event predictions, particularly peak flows, all models struggled at low flow. Korean watersheds’ significant prediction improvements highlight the hybrid models’ effectiveness in regions with pronounced temporal hydrological variability. This study underscores the importance of selecting a specific hybrid approach based on the desired objectives rather than solely relying on statistical metrics that often reflect average performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yifru et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e72644b6db6435876a02cchttps://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2024.016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A national-scale hybrid model for enhanced streamflow estimation – consolidating a physically based hydrological model with long short-term memory (LSTM) networks2024 · 15 citations
  2. 2A hybrid approach to improvement of watershed water quality modeling by coupling process–based and deep learning models2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3Streamflow Prediction at the Intersection of Physics and Machine Learning: A Case Study of Two Mediterranean‐Climate Watersheds2024 · 20 citations
  4. 4A novel hybrid fine-tuning method for supercharging deep learning model development for hydrological prediction2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Improving the streamflow prediction accuracy in sparse data regions: a fresh perspective on integrated hydrological-hydrodynamic and hybrid machine learning models2024 · 6 citations