PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 2024Frontiers in Dentistry0 citationsOpen Access

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Clinical and Radiographic Success Rates of MTA and rhBMP2 in Pulpotomy of Primary Teeth

View Full Paper
NNNosrat NourbakhshSZSanaz ZiaeiHPHesam Panahi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Objectives: In an ideal pulpotomy, the radicular pulp remains vital, healthy, and fully encased within an odontoblastic layer. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been suggested to facilitate this outcome. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic failure and success rates of MTA and rhBMP2 as pulpotomy medicaments. Materials and Methods: Sixty-eight teeth from 3–6-year-old children were randomly assigned to two groups using a split-mouth design. Cervical pulpotomy was performed using MTA in one group and rhBMP2 in the other. Subsequently, the teeth were restored with stainless-steel crowns. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-up intervals to evaluate success and failure rates. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P<0.05) Results: At six and nine months, one tooth in the BMP2 group and one tooth in the MTA group showed internal resorption, respectively. After 12 months, one tooth in the BMP2 group exhibited PDL widening. The radiographic success rate was 100% for the MTA- and 97.1% for the BMP2-group at six months, 96.7% for both groups at nine months, and 96.7% and 93.3%, respectively, at 12 months. No clinical failure criteria were observed in any of the teeth. Survival analysis revealed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: The study reveals comparable outcomes between rhBMP2 and MTA, suggesting rhBMP2 as a viable alternative for pulpotomy in primary teeth. With minimal incidences of complications and no significant differences noted, rhBMP2 demonstrates potential for clinical use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nourbakhsh et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7296db6db6435876a3b22https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i12.15224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Treatment of inflamed ferret dental pulps with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein‐72000 · 138 citations
  2. 2Cytotoxicity of endodontic materials1998 · 256 citations
  3. 3Bone morphogenetic proteins in development1996 · 707 citations
  4. 4Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: a meta-analysis2006 · 107 citations
  5. 5Recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 induces dentin formation: An experimental study in miniature swine1997 · 80 citations