PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 22, 20240 citationsOpen Access

Equalizing prognostic disparities in stage III KRAS-mutant NSCLC: addition of durvalumab to combined chemoradiotherapy improves survival

View Full Paper
EEElla Ä. EklundMOMathilda OrgardDWDelice Wallin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is heterogeneous and identification of subgroups with differential responses is crucial to optimize treatment. Addition of durvalumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has previously been shown to improve survival outcomes. Meanwhile, subgroups harboring KRAS mutations have been shown to have worse prognosis. We investigated whether KRAS mutational status may affect survival outcomes after adjuvant durvalumab following cCRT in stage III NSCLC. Methods In this retrospective study, we present a real-world dataset of all stage III NSCLC patients treated with cCRT with a curative intent and molecularly assessed between 2016-2021 in West Sweden. Primary study outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results We identified 145 patients receiving cCRT with a curative intent, 32% harbored an activating mutation in the KRAS gene (KRAS MUT ). Compared to KRAS wild-type (KRAS WT ), KRAS MUT had a worse OS ( p =0.047) and PFS ( p =0.038). The finding persisted on multivariate analysis with OS (HR 1.703, 95%CI 1.074-2.702, p = 0.024) and PFS (HR 1.628, 95% CI 1.081-2.453, p = 0.020). After the addition of durvalumab to cCRT, there were no longer any significant differences between KRAS WT and KRAS MUT in OS or PFS. Conclusions KRAS mutations are a negative prognostic factor after cCRT in stage III NSCLC, and the addition of durvalumab equalizes the negative impact of harboring this mutation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eklund et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e72e40b6db6435876a83dchttps://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.21.24304669
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of <i>KRAS</i> co-mutations on the efficacy of durvalumab in patients with locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (ChRT).2026
  2. 2Impact of KRAS G12C mutation on the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage II or III non-small cell lung cancer2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Impact of high-risk genomic alterations on survival outcomes in patients with stage III non–small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiation and consolidation durvalumab.2026
  4. 4Real-World Survival Outcomes Following Chemoradiotherapy with or Without Durvalumab in PD-L1-Defined Subgroups of Stage III Unresectable NSCLC2026
  5. 5315P PREDIRAD-NSCLC: Predictors of radiation pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer2026