PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 20, 2024Social Choice and Welfare3 citationsOpen Access

Dynamic proportional rankings

View Full Paper
JIJonas IsraelMBMarkus Brill

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Proportional ranking rules aggregate approval-style preferences of agents into a collective ranking such that groups of agents with similar preferences are adequately represented. Motivated by the application of live Q&A platforms, where submitted questions need to be ranked based on the interests of the audience, we study a dynamic extension of the proportional rankings setting. In our setting, the goal is to maintain the proportionality of a ranking when alternatives (i.e., questions)—not necessarily from the top of the ranking—get selected sequentially. We propose generalizations of well-known ranking rules to this setting and study their monotonicity and proportionality properties. We also evaluate the performance of these rules experimentally, using realistic probabilistic assumptions on the selection procedure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Israel et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e732cdb6db6435876ac284https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-023-01498-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Perpetual Voting: Fairness in Long-Term Decision Making2020 · 39 citations
  2. 2Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques2002 · 4,772 citations
  3. 3Robust and Verifiable Proportionality Axioms for Multiwinner Voting2023 · 22 citations
  4. 4Fully Proportional Representation1995 · 209 citations
  5. 5Transitive voting2004 · 16 citations