PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2024SA Journal of Human Resource Management4 citationsOpen Access

How leader-member exchange affects work outcomes in small-and-medium enterprises?

View Full Paper
DADorothea Wahyu ArianiNFNur Feriyanto

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Orientation: Employees with a collectivistic culture want the closeness and support of their leaders. How leader-member exchange (LMX), perceived organisational support (POS), job satisfaction (JS) and organisational commitment (OC) influence each other still requires in-depth research because there are differences between the results of previous studies. Research purpose: This study examined the relationship model of LMX and POS as antecedent, mediator and moderator variables on work outcomes such as JS and OC in small- and medium enterprises (SMEs) with a collectivistic culture and high-power distance. Motivation for the study: Leadership in SMEs gets less attention because of its role in managing and carrying out operational activities. Research approach/design and method: Data were collected from 427 employees using questionnaires with purposive sampling, which was tested for validity and reliability. Structural equation modelling (SEM) and multi-group SEM were used to test the relationship model. Main findings: The results of testing four relationship models proved that the LMX relationship did not directly affect JS and OC but was mediated by POS. LMX can also be a mediator and moderator of the relationship model. Practical/managerial implications: This study emphasises the need to minimise the differences between in-group and out-group in the leaders-followers relationship to improve employee performance. Leaders must expand the range of their relationships with followers to improve work outcomes. Contribution/value-add: This study examined LMX as an important predictor of work outcomes with clearer mechanisms. LMX cannot be a predictor if employees do not feel the leader's support as a representative of the organisation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ariani et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73502b6db6435876aeb73https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v22i0.2397
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries.2012 · 475 citations
  2. 2Enhancing Culture and Retention through an Expanded Leader-Member Exchange Theory: A Focus on Commitment and Fairness2025
  3. 3Effect of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) on Job Performance: The Role of Innovative Work Behavior among MSME Employees in Indonesia's Creative Economy2025
  4. 4Linking leader-member exchange ambivalence and presenteeism: the roles of organization-based self-esteem and supervisor’s organizational embodiment2026
  5. 5Translating team-member exchange relationships to school outcomes: the mediating role of leader-member exchange2024 · 6 citations