PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2024Environmental Science & Technology25 citationsOpen Access

Subsidizing Grid-Based Electrolytic Hydrogen Will Increase Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Coal Dominated Power Systems

View Full Paper
LPLiqun PengYGYang GuoSLShangwei Liu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Clean hydrogen has the potential to serve as an energy carrier and feedstock in decarbonizing energy systems, especially in "hard-to-abate" sectors. Although many countries have implemented policies to promote electrolytic hydrogen development, the impact of these measures on costs of production and greenhouse gas emissions remains unclear. Our study conducts an integrated analysis of provincial levelized costs and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for all hydrogen production types in China. We find that subsidies are critical to accelerate low carbon electrolytic hydrogen development. Subsidies on renewable-based hydrogen provide cost-effective carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emission reductions. However, subsidies on grid-based hydrogen increase CO2e emissions even compared with coal-based hydrogen because grid electricity in China still relies heavily on coal power and likely will beyond 2030. In fact, CO2e emissions from grid-based hydrogen may increase further if China continues to approve new coal power plants. The levelized costs of renewable energy-based electrolytic hydrogen vary among provinces. Transporting renewable-based hydrogen through pipelines from low- to high-cost production regions reduces the national average levelized cost of renewables-based hydrogen but may increase the risk of hydrogen leakage and the resulting indirect warming effects. Our findings emphasize that policy and economic support for nonfossil electrolytic hydrogen is critical to avoid an increase in CO2e emissions as hydrogen use rises during a clean energy transition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peng et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73cb8b6db6435876b62b5https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03045
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Emission scenarios for a global hydrogen economy and the consequences for global air pollution2011 · 79 citations
  2. 2Climate, air quality and human health benefits of various solar photovoltaic deployment scenarios in China in 20302018 · 83 citations
  3. 3Life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of China's power generation on spatial and temporal scale2022 · 44 citations
  4. 4Options of natural gas pipeline reassignment for hydrogen: Cost assessment for a Germany case study2020 · 259 citations
  5. 5A comprehensive estimate of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from onshore wind energy in China2022 · 57 citations