PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2024Electrophoresis8 citationsOpen Access

Strategies to deal with genetic analyzer‐specific DNA methylation measurements

View Full Paper
MSMoon Hyun SoSeoul National UniversityJLJi Eun LeeSeoul National UniversityHLHwan Young LeeYonsei University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Targeted bisulfite sequencing using single‐base extension (SBE) can be used to measure DNA methylation via capillary electrophoresis on genetic analyzers in forensic labs. Several accurate age prediction models have been reported using this method. However, using different genetic analyzers with different software settings can generate different methylation values, leading to significant errors in age prediction. To address this issue, the study proposes and compares four methods as follows: (1) adjusting methylation values using numerous actual body fluid DNA samples, (2) adjusting methylation values using control DNAs with varying methylation ratios, (3) constructing new age prediction models for each genetic analyzer type, and (4) constructing new age prediction models that could be applied to all types of genetic analyzers. To test the methods for adjusting values using actual body fluid DNA samples, previously reported adjusting equations were used for blood/saliva DNA age prediction markers ( ELOVL2 , FHL2 , KLF14 , MIR29B2CHG/C1orf132 , and TRIM59 ). New equations were generated for semen DNA age prediction markers ( TTC7B , LOC401324/cg12837463 , and LOC729960/NOX4 ) by drawing polynomial regression lines between the results of the three types of genetic analyzers (3130, 3500, and SeqStudio). The same method was applied to obtain adjustment equations using 11 control DNA samples. To develop new age prediction models for each genetic analyzer type, linear regression analysis was conducted using DNA methylation data from 150 blood, 150 saliva, and 62 semen samples. For the genetic analyzer‐independent models, control DNAs were used to formulate equations for calibrating the bias of the data from each genetic analyzer, and linear regression analysis was performed using calibrated body fluid DNA data. In the comparison results, the genetic analyzer‐specific models showed the highest accuracy. However, genetic analyzer‐independent models through bias adjustment also provided accurate age prediction results, suggesting its use as an alternative in situations with multiple constraints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

So et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73cbeb6db6435876b647fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202300185
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A collaborative exercise on DNA methylation-based age prediction and body fluid typing2021 · 44 citations
  2. 2Genome-wide Methylation Profiles Reveal Quantitative Views of Human Aging Rates2012 · 4,624 citations
  3. 3Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: Performance Comparison of Different Kits and Methylation Quantitation of Epigenetic Biomarkers that Have the Potential to Be Used in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing2015 · 97 citations
  4. 4Genetic analyzer‐dependent DNA methylation detection and its application to existing age prediction models2021 · 22 citations
  5. 5A Comparison of Forensic Age Prediction Models Using Data From Four DNA Methylation Technologies2020 · 63 citations