PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2024Medicine3 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of ChatGPT in providing appropriate fracture prevention recommendations and medical science question responses: A quantitative research

View Full Paper
JMJiahao MengZZZiyi ZhangHTHang Tang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Currently, there are limited studies assessing ChatGPT ability to provide appropriate responses to medical questions. Our study aims to evaluate ChatGPT adequacy in responding to questions regarding osteoporotic fracture prevention and medical science. We created a list of 25 questions based on the guidelines and our clinical experience. Additionally, we included 11 medical science questions from the journal Science. Three patients, 3 non-medical professionals, 3 specialist doctor and 3 scientists were involved to evaluate the accuracy and appropriateness of responses by ChatGPT3.5 on October 2, 2023. To simulate a consultation, an inquirer (either a patient or non-medical professional) would send their questions to a consultant (specialist doctor or scientist) via a website. The consultant would forward the questions to ChatGPT for answers, which would then be evaluated for accuracy and appropriateness by the consultant before being sent back to the inquirer via the website for further review. The primary outcome is the appropriate, inappropriate, and unreliable rate of ChatGPT responses as evaluated separately by the inquirer and consultant groups. Compared to orthopedic clinicians, the patients' rating on the appropriateness of ChatGPT responses to the questions about osteoporotic fracture prevention was slightly higher, although the difference was not statistically significant (88% vs 80%, P = .70). For medical science questions, non-medical professionals and medical scientists rated similarly. In addition, the experts' ratings on the appropriateness of ChatGPT responses to osteoporotic fracture prevention and to medical science questions were comparable. On the other hand, the patients perceived that the appropriateness of ChatGPT responses to osteoporotic fracture prevention questions was slightly higher than that to medical science questions (88% vs 72·7%, P = .34). ChatGPT is capable of providing comparable and appropriate responses to medical science questions, as well as to fracture prevention related issues. Both the inquirers seeking advice and the consultants providing advice recognize ChatGPT expertise in these areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meng et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73cccb6db6435876b6957https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000037458
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Appropriateness of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Recommendations Obtained From a Popular Online Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence Model2023 · 485 citations
  2. 2Evaluating GPT as an Adjunct for Radiologic Decision Making: GPT-4 Versus GPT-3.5 in a Breast Imaging Pilot2023 · 280 citations
  3. 3ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports2023 · 549 citations
  4. 4Analysis of large-language model versus human performance for genetics questions2023 · 50 citations
  5. 5ChatGPT Makes Medicine Easy to Swallow: An Exploratory Case Study on Simplified Radiology Reports2022 · 105 citations