PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2024Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society5 citationsOpen Access

Mutual occurrence ratio of planets – I. New clues to reveal origins of hot and warm Jupiter from the RV sample

View Full Paper
XSXiang-Ning SuHZHui ZhangJZJi‐Lin Zhou

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Many studies have analyzed planetary occurrence rates and their dependence on the host's properties to provide clues to planet formation, but few have focused on the mutual occurrence ratio of different kinds of planets. Such relations reveal whether and how one type of planet evolves into another, e. g. from a cold Jupiter to a warm or even hot Jupiter, and demonstrate how stellar properties impact the evolution history of planetary systems. We propose a new classification of giant planets, i. e. cold Jupiter (CJ), warm Jupiter (WJ), and hot Jupiter (HJ), according to their position relative to the snow line in the system. Then, we derive their occurrence rates (₇₉, ₖ₉, ₂₉) with the detection completeness of RV (Radial Velocity) surveys (HARPS\& CORALIE) considered. Finally, we analyze the correlation between the mutual occurrence ratios, i. e. ₂₉ / ₖ₉, ₂₉ / ₇₉ or ₖ₉/ ₇₉, and various stellar properties, e. g. effective temperature T ₄₅₅. Our results show that the ₇₉, ₖ₉ and ₂₉ are increasing with the increasing T ₄₅₅ when T ₄₅₅ (4600, 6600] K. Furthermore, the mutual occurrence ratio between CJ and WJ, i. e. ₂₉ / ₖ₉, shows a decreasing trend with the increasing T ₄₅₅. But, both ₂₉/ ₇₉ and ₖ₉/ ₇₉ are increasing when the T ₄₅₅ increases. Further consistency tests reveal that the formation processes of WJ and HJ may be dominated by orbital change mechanisms rather than the in-situ model. However, unlike WJ, which favors gentle disk migration, HJ favors a more violent mechanism that requires further investigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Su et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73dc3b6db6435876b6b71https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae733
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper