PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 20240 citationsOpen Access

On the Relationship between Preferential and Multilateral Trade Liberalization: The Case of Customs Unions

View Full Paper
HYHalis Murat YildizKSKamal SaggiAWAlan D. Woodland

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This paper compares equilibrium outcomes of two games of trade liberalization. In the Bilateralism game, countries choose whether to liberalize trade preferentially via a customs union (CU ), multilaterally, or not at all. The Multilateralism game is a restricted version of the Bilateralism game in that countries cannot form CUs and can only undertake non-discriminatory trade liberalization. When countries have symmetric endowments, global free trade is the only stable equilibrium of both games. Allowing for endowment asymmetry, we isolate circumstances where the option to form CUs helps further the cause of multilateral liberalization as well as where it does not. (JEL F12, F13)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yildiz et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7555db6db6435876cd42chttps://doi.org/10.32920/25365445
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1On the Relationship between Preferential and Multilateral Trade Liberalization: The Case of Customs Unions2024
  2. 2Bilateralism vs. multilateralism: Role of political economy for the prospect of multilateral free trade2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3On the Relationship between Tariff Levels and the Nature of Mergers2024
  4. 4Two-Stage Games of Complete but Imperfect Information: Application in International Trade with Tariff2024
  5. 5Non-excludable Bilateral Trade between Groups2024 · 1 citations