PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2024Journal of Medical Internet Research56 citationsOpen Access

Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study

View Full Paper
ZHZhe HeBBBalu BhasuranQJQiao Jin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Although patients have easy access to their electronic health records and laboratory test result data through patient portals, laboratory test results are often confusing and hard to understand. Many patients turn to web-based forums or question-and-answer (Q&A) sites to seek advice from their peers. The quality of answers from social Q&A sites on health-related questions varies significantly, and not all responses are accurate or reliable. Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have opened a promising avenue for patients to have their questions answered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

He et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e75683b6db6435876ce3cbhttps://doi.org/10.2196/56655
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper