PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2024International Journal of Food Science & Technology1 citations

Effect of high‐speed homogenisation on the morphological characteristics and survivability of Lactobacillus rhamnosusGG‐coated microbeads

View Full Paper
UAUmair AliMSMuhammad SaeedZAZulfiqar Ahmad

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Summary Xanthan gum can be utilised to overcome the structural defects in alginate microbeads and to improve the stability of microbeads under harsh conditions, that is, high acidic pH and homogenisation speeds. Present study was conducted to assess the survival of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG using alginate (1.5% w/v) and xanthan gum (0.5% w/v) for encapsulation and structural modifications of microbeads. Homogenisation emulsion technique was used for encapsulation at various homogenisation speeds, that is, 3000 rpm (HS 1 ), 6000 rpm (HS 2 ), 9000 rpm (HS 3 ) and 12 000 rpm (HS 4 ). The resultant microbeads were characterised for diameter, beads yield, structural morphology using the scanning electron microscopy, probiotic count, bacterial survival, storage stability and homogenisation efficiency. Scanning electron microscopy images indicated that the beads produced at 12 000 rpm are more uniform, spherical in shape and have large surface area when compared with the other treatment groups. The diameter of microbeads was reduced from 323.1 to 238.2 μm as the homogenisation speed increased from 3000 to 12 000 rpm. The highest bacterial count (i.e., 9.45 log CFU g −1 ), homogenisation efficiency (91.6%), beads yield (23.0%), survivability (86.5%) and storage stability (9.84 to 7.90 log CFU g −1 ) were recorded at 12 000 rpm (HS 4 ). Conclusively, the homogenised encapsulated microbeads at 12 000 rpm significantly improved the beads surface and sphericity, and bacterial survivability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ali et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e75ef0b6db6435876d5bd6https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.17033
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Probiotic Encapsulation: Bead Design Improves Bacterial Performance during In Vitro Digestion (Part 2: Operational Conditions of Vibrational Technology)2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Dual-Cross-Linked Gelatin-Polysaccharide Hydrogel Beads for Efficient Protection and Controlled Release of Probiotics2026
  3. 3Survivability of probiotic under simulated gastrointestinal conditions as affected by synbiotic (alginate-arabinoxylan) encapsulation2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Improving stabilising effect of Enterococcus faecalis HZNU S1 microbeads with rice milk and alginate as wall materials2025
  5. 5Survival Behavior of <i>Lactobacillus plantarum</i> Loaded in Alginate/Konjac Glucomannan Composite Beads Under Storage and Gastrointestinal Conditions2025