PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 20243 citations

Performance Comparison for Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) across Noiseless Simulation, Experimentally Benchmarked Noisy Simulation, and Experimental Hardware Platforms

View Full Paper
SSSanyam SinghalVSVandit SrivastavaPRP Rohith

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We implement Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) on NP-Hard problem MaxCut (for 3-chain and 4-node chain graphs, and 4-node and 6node Mobius Ladder graphs) on a quantum simulator without noise, a simulator with experimentally bench-marked noise (fake back-end), and 5-qubit and 7-qubit processors. We use the following modes of operation: QAOA parameters updated through forward pass on the quantum circuit, modelled by the noiseless simulator as well as fake back-end, and the quantum circuit for final run with updated parameters implemented on the noiseless simulator, fake back-end, and real quantum processors. While QAOA yields higher approximation ratio compared to random guess for almost all graph instances, we also conclude that given the noise in existing quantum hardware, a quantum circuit with more than two stages is not suitable for experimental implementation of QAOA currently.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Singhal et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e75ef7b6db6435876d5e19https://doi.org/10.1109/edtm58488.2024.10512142
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper