PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2024European Journal of Applied Physiology0 citationsOpen Access

Reliability and validity of the MX3 portable sweat sodium analyser during exercise in warm conditions

View Full Paper
HBHarry A. BrownBCBrad ClarkJPJulien D. Périard

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Accurately measuring sweat sodium concentration (Na +) in the field is advantageous for coaches, scientists, and dieticians looking to tailor hydration strategies. The MX3 hydration testing system is a new portable analyser that uses pre-calibrated biosensors to measure sweat Na +. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the MX3 hydration testing system. Methods Thirty-one (11 females) recreationally active participants completed one experimental trial. During this trial, participants exercised at a self-selected pace for 45 min in a warm environment (31. 5 ± 0. 8 °C, 63. 2 ± 1. 3% relative humidity). Sweat samples were collected from three measurement sites using absorbent patches. The samples were then analysed for sweat Na + using both the MX3 hydration testing system and the Horiba LAQUAtwin-NA-11. The reliability of the MX3 hydration testing system was determined following two measurements of the same sweat sample. Results The mean difference between measurements was 0. 1 mmoL·L −1 (95% limits of agreement (LoA): − 9. 2, 9. 4). The analyser demonstrated a coefficient of variation (CV) of 5. 6% and the standard error of measurement was 3. 3 mmoL·L −1. When compared to the Horiba LAQUAtwin-NA-11, there was a mean difference of − 1. 7 mmoL·L −1 (95% LoA: − 0. 25 X X ¯, 0. 25 X X ¯) and the CV was 9. 8%. Conclusion The MX3 hydration testing system demonstrated very good single-trial reliability, moderate agreement and a very good CV relative to the Horiba LAQUAtwin-Na-11. To further validate its performance, the MX3 hydration testing system should be compared with analytical techniques known for superior reliability and validity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brown et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e76041b6db6435876d6e6chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05447-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper