PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2024General Psychiatry4 citationsOpen Access

Chinese version of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire: psychometric properties and clinical applications

View Full Paper
XCXin‐lu CaiQYQingying YeKNKe Ni

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background The alexithymia trait is of high clinical interest. The Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ) was recently developed to enable detailed facet-level and valence-specific assessments of alexithymia. Aims In this paper, we introduce the first Chinese version of the PAQ and examine its psychometric properties and clinical applications. Methods In Study 1, the PAQ was administered to 990 Chinese participants. We examined its factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, as well as convergent, concurrent and discriminant validity. In Study 2, four groups, including a major depressive disorder (MDD) group (n=50), a matched healthy control group for MDD (n=50), a subclinical depression group (n=50) and a matched healthy control group for subclinical depression (n=50), were recruited. Group comparisons were conducted to assess the clinical relevance of the PAQ. Results In Study 1, the intended five-factor structure of the PAQ was found to fit the data well. The PAQ showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, as well as good convergent, concurrent and discriminant validity. In Study 2, the PAQ was able to successfully distinguish the MDD group and the subclinical depression group from their matched healthy controls. Conclusions The Chinese version of the PAQ is a valid and reliable instrument for comprehensively assessing alexithymia in the general population and adults with clinical/subclinical depression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cai et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e76333b6db6435876d8eb7https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2023-101281
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper