PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2024Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract B030: DNA methylation profiling identifies subset of low-grade endometrial neoplasms with poor response to progestin therapy

View Full Paper
LLLawrence Hsu LinKFKyriaki FountaNCNyasha Chambwe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: We aimed to investigate the DNA methylation profile of low-grade endometrial neoplasms before and after progestin therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/atypical hyperplasia (EIN/AH) and grade 1 endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) treated with progestin therapy. DNA was extracted from 24 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumors before and 19 tumors after progestin therapy (median interval between specimens: 12. 1 months). Methylation profiling was performed using the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC array. Laser-capture microdissection was used to enrich samples with low tumor content. Results: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 38 years were included. Majority of patients were nulligravid (58%), and self-identified as non-Hispanic (83%) and white (42%). Ten patients had a diagnosis of EIN/AH, while 14 were grade 1 EEC. Ten cases showed complete response, 7 partial responses, 8 showed no response between the pre- and post-treatment samples. Ten patients had regression of disease on follow-up, while 9 showed persistent tumor. In 5 patients, clinical outcome could not be assessed due to short time of exposure (6 months). Unsupervised clustering based on top 3, 000 differentially methylated sites (DMS) in 24 pre-treated tumors identified 2 different groups. Cluster 1 (n= 11) was composed of significantly older patients (p=0. 047; median age: 39 vs 37 years) and more likely to have EEC on histologic examination (p=0. 016; 100% vs 54%). Tumors in Cluster 1 were more likely to show absence of pathologic response following progestin therapy (p= 0. 038; 55% vs 8%). Although no statistical significance was reached regarding clinical outcome (p=0. 2), patients in Cluster 1 showed regression of disease in only 29% of cases (2/7), while in Cluster 2, 67% of patients showed regression of tumor (8/12). There was no difference regarding gravidity, race/ethnicity, body mass index, type of progestin, and follow-up time. KEGG pathways analysis revealed that the most significantly different pathways between the 2 clusters were: maturity onset diabetes of young, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, and signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells. Pairwise differential DNA methylation analysis between 15 pairs of pre- and post-treatment samples that passed quality control showed a hypermethylation effect of progestin therapy in the majority of DMS, including sites in open sea, northern and southern shores and shelves. Although there were sites in CpG islands with a hypermethylation pattern after treatment, progestin therapy had a predominantly hypomethylation effect on CpG islands. The gene set enrichment based on DMS showed significant change in genes mostly related to cell-cell adhesion following progestin therapy. Conclusion: DNA methylation profiling identifies a subset of EIN/AH and grade 1 EEC with poor response to progestin therapy. The methylation landscape of these low-grade neoplasms undergoes changes after progestin treatment. Citation Format: Lawrence H. Lin, Kyriaki Founta, Nyasha Chambwe, Deborah F. DeLair. DNA methylation profiling identifies subset of low-grade endometrial neoplasms with poor response to progestin therapy abstract. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Transforming Care through Science; 2023 Nov 16-18; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30 (5Suppl): Abstract nr B030.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e76734b6db6435876dc95bhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.endo24-b030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper