PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2024BMJ0 citationsOpen Access

6ER-028 Real-world treatment pattern and effectiveness of pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multi-institutional study in Taiwan

View Full Paper
KCKai‐Wei ChangUniversity of California, Los AngelesHCHY ChenChang Gung Memorial Hospital

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background and Importance Pirfenidone and nintedanib have been proven survival benefits and been currently approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, real-world comparison of effectiveness between two antifibrotics remains limited in Asia. Aim and Objectives Our study was aimed to assess: (1) factors associated with the choice of pirfenidone versus nintedanib; (2) dose modification during treatment; (3) overall survival (OS). Material and Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study by using the largest multi-institutional electronic medical records in Taiwan. We included IPF patients newly receiving pirfenidone or nintedanib during 2018–2020. We followed up included patients to death, loss of follow-up or December 2022. The clinical factors included age, sex, lung function, biochemical data, comorbidities and co-medications. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with drug choice. Dose modification was assessed every 3 months by using dose intensity in follow-up period based on as-treated analysis. In OS analysis, we applied probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Cox regression model to enhance the comparability of study subjects and estimate hazard ratio (HR) between two treatment groups, respectively. Results A total of 86 patients receiving pirfenidone and 142 patients receiving nintedanib. Mean age and Forced vital capacity (FVC) were 70.7 11.3 years and 68.8 17.4%, respectively. The use of nintedanib was positively associated with the patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (odds ratio: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.06 – 4.18). Dose reduction rate was similar between two groups (59.3% vs. 65.4%, P = 0.34). After a median of 25.5 months follow-up, nintedanib users were associated with worsen OS than pirfenidone users (adjusted HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.24 – 3.45). Conclusion and Relevance Our study showed CKD patients were likely prescribed nintedanib. Pirfenidone users had association of better all-cause mortality than nintedanib users. Further studies are suggested to confirm our findings. References and/or Acknowledgements Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chang et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e76a16b6db6435876df2cbhttps://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-eahp.490
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Long-term treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a comparative, real-world cohort study2025 · 5 citations
  2. 2Comparison of the Efficacy of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in the Treatment of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis—A Single-Center Experience2026
  3. 3A39-33 Comparative Evaluation of Survival Outcomes and Safety Between Nintedanib and Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2026
  4. 4Survival impact and safety comparison of pirfenidone and nintedanib for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A meta-analysis.2025
  5. 5Assessing the impact of nintedanib and pirfenidone on lung function in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A comprehensive meta-analysis2026