PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 29, 2024Jurnal POLIMESIN0 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of Location Class Category and Pipe Wall Thickness on Risk Level Onshore Pipeline Oil

View Full Paper
ZEZakki Fuadi EmzainMFMakhmudul FikriSASatworo Adiwidodo

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Pipelines are essential infrastructure for efficient oil and gas production operation, necessitating their continuous and reliable functionality in all locations and circumstances. Nevertheless, the pipeline can fail during operation due to multiple detrimental variables. This study evaluated the impact of the location classification category and pipe wall thickness on the risk level of onshore pipelines. The risk assessment method employed was a semiquantitative approach derived from the reference "Pipeline Risk Management Manual" by W. Kent Muhlbauer. The distributing crude oil pipeline, which spans a distance of 18 kilometers and has a diameter of 6 inches, was evaluated. The evaluation yielded a pipeline relative risk score of 0.91, classifying the pipeline as belonging to risk category 1B. Following this, the assessment findings were analyzed for all 36 pipeline segments, classifying 26 segments in the 1B category and the remaining 10 segments in the 2B category. From the analysis results, the difference between the two risk categories was produced by differences in location class categories, where the pipeline segment in location class 1 creates a 1B risk category; meanwhile, class 3 produces a 2B risk category. Furthermore, a pipeline with a wall thickness of 5.156 inches is associated with a risk score of 0.81, but a wall thickness of 4.1 inches yields a score of 1.41. These results indicate that the location class category and pipe wall thickness significantly impact the risk of onshore pipelines.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Emzain et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7709bb6db6435876e6156https://doi.org/10.30811/jpl.v22i1.4082
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Integrated Risk Assessment of Mountainous Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipelines Based on Multisource Spatial Data2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Risk Assessment of River-Channel Washout Disasters for Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipelines Considering Storm-Induced Flood Scour Effects2026
  3. 3Seismic Disaster Risk Assessment of Oil and Gas Pipelines2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Study on Residual Strength of Pipelines with Single-Point Uniform Corrosion Defects Under Internal Pressure Loading2026
  5. 5A Detailed Structural Review of Onshore and Offshore Pipelines Containing Defects2025